Skip to content

What is tennis slang for winning 6-0?

What is tennis slang for winning 6-0?

What is tennis slang for winning 6-0?

In tennis slang, winning a set 6-0 is often referred to as a “bagel.” This term is commonly used to describe a set in which one player fails to win any games, resulting in a “zero” on the scoreboard. So, if a player wins a set 6-0, you might hear someone say they “served a bagel.”

In tennis, the slang term for winning a set 6-0 is “bagel”. The term is used because the number zero resembles the shape of a bagel. 

Here are some other tennis terms:

  • Golden set: A rare type of bagel where no points are lost. To win a golden set, a player must score at least 24 points without giving up a single point. 
  • Breadstick: A term used when a set is won or lost 6-1 or 1-6. 
  • Love: A word used to describe a score of zero in tennis. The word has been used in tennis since the late 1800s. 
  • Deuce: A tie score of 40-40, or three points per side. 
  • Tiebreaker: A game played when a set is tied 6-6. To win, a player must score at least seven points and win by two. 

What is tennis slang for winning 6-0?

There are many expressions in different languages. Most, like the English “bagel” refer to the shape of the number 0 – in Chinese and Hindi it’s called an “egg”, in Croatian and Serbian, a “potato”.

Slovenia has an interesting expression. If you win a set 6–0, you have “tied a necktie (of the opponent)”.

It is not clear where the expression comes from, but one possible explanation I read is that men were traditionally taught how to tie a simple necktie knot “in 6 easy steps”.
Similarly to an experienced man showing a young boy how to tie a tie, a winning player gives his opponent a lesson in 6 steps on how real men do it.

There are also other possible explanations, the circle of the tie that goes around the neck does look like 0, also “tying a necktie” was sometimes used as a euphemism for a hangman tying the noose around the neck of the convict, so it could mean “you are about to hang your opponent”.

Why do we call zero score in tennis called as “love”? Why do the scores in tennis count as 15, 30, and 40 (why not 45)?

Simply because it is tough to pronounce forty five, which is two word number. Fifteen, thirty are almost pronounced a single go. In fact people didnt want to settle on 50 because it sounds similar to 15. Nowadays people are trying to change 15 to 5.. because 5 is easier. And 0 is love because, we are trying to be sweet to the player losing.

Importantly why 15, 30 etc. instead of 1,2, 3 ? The answer is very simple. The game scores are counted 1,2,3,4. So, they wanted a system that is not confusing the points scores with the games scored. The chances of someone having 15 games in a set is too small.There you go,

The term “love” in tennis to indicate a score of zero is believed to derive from the French word “l’oeuf,” meaning “egg,” which symbolizes the shape of a zero. The idea is that an egg looks like the numeral, and over time, “l’oeuf” was shortened to “love” in English tennis terminology.

As for the scoring of 15, 30, and 40 instead of a straightforward 0, 15, 30, and 45, the reason isn’t definitively known, but there are a couple of theories. One popular theory suggests that the scoring system is based on the division of a clock face. The numbers 15, 30, and 45 were originally used to represent increments on the clock, with the final point being called “game” instead of 45.

Another theory posits that using 40 instead of 45 makes it easier to announce the score more clearly, especially in the context of the advantage scoring system (e.g., “40-30” and “deuce”). The use of “40” allows for a clear distinction between scores without having to say “45.”

Overall, while the exact reasons may not be completely clear, these historical and practical explanations provide insight into the unique scoring system of tennis.

Find driver license number by ssn

Has any pro tennis player won a match after having lost a set 0-6?

Complete List since 2000

2000 Miami Masters
Hard R128 Gianluca Pozzi bt Jonas Bjorkman
0-6 7-6(3) 6-3

2000 San Marino
Clay R32 Attila Savolt bt Marcelo Charpentier
0-6 6-4 6-4

2000 Stuttgart Outdoor
Clay R32 Karim Alami bt Fredrik Jonsson
0-6 7-6(5) 6-2

2000 Doha
Hard R32 Daniel Vacek bt Fernando Vicente
0-6 6-3 6-4

2000 Auckland
Hard R32 Michael Sell bt Nicolas Escude
0-6 7-6(7) 6-1

2000 Copenhagen
Hard R32 Tomas Behrend bt Marc Rosset
0-6 6-1 7-6(4)

2000 Bucharest
Clay R16 Alberto Martin bt Christophe Rochus
0-6 6-4 6-4

2000 Barcelona
Clay R32 Gaston Gaudio bt Alex Corretja
0-6 6-3 6-3

2000 Indianapolis
Hard QF Marat Safin bt Sebastien Grosjean
0-6 6-3 6-4

2000 Dusseldorf
Clay RR Dominik Hrbaty bt Pete Sampras
0-6 6-4 6-4

2001 Buenos Aires
Clay QF Gustavo Kuerten bt Guillermo Canas
0-6 6-1 6-2

2001 Monte Carlo Masters Clay R64 Fernando Vicente bt Ivan Ljubicic
0-6 6-4 6-1

2001 St. Poelten
Clay R32 Nicolas Massu bt Olivier Rochus
0-6 6-4 6-4

2002 Miami Masters
Hard R128 Feliciano Lopez bt Xavier Malisse
0-6 7-5 6-4

2002 Mallorca
Clay R32 Gaston Gaudio bt Fernando Vicente
0-6 6-3 6-2

2002 Delray Beach
Hard R32 Davide Sanguinette bt Christophe Rochus
0-6 6-4 6-1

2002 Sopot
Clay R32 Franco Squillari bt David Sanchez
0-6 6-4 6-4

2002 Hamburg Masters
Clay R64 Tommy Robredo bt Franco Squillari
0-6 6-2 6-1

2002 Monte Carlo Masters Clay R64 Michel Kratochvil bt Max Mirnyi
0-6 6-3 6-4

2002 Washington
Hard R16 Jarkko Nieminen bt Alex Kim
0-6 6-4 6-3

2003 Casablanca
Clay R32 Nicolas Massu bt Fernando Vicente
0-6 6-3 7-6(5)

2003 Bangkok
Hard R32 Paradorn Srichaphan bt Vladimir Voltchkov
0-6 6-3 6-2

2003 ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Grass R32 Fernando Vicente bt Davide Sanguinetti
0-6 7-6(10) 6-2

2003 Barcelona
Clay R64 Paul Henri Mathieu bt Werner Eschauer
0-6 6-4 6-3

2003 Scottsdale
Hard QF Mark Philippoussis bt David Nalbandian
0-6 6-3 6-4

2003 Vina del Mar
Clay R32 Agustin Calleri bt Cecil Mamiit
0-6 6-3 6-4

2003 Miami Masters
Hard R128 Mardy Fish bt Adrian Voinea
0-6 6-4 6-2

2003 Rome Masters
Clay R64 David Ferrer bt Andre Agassi
0-6 7-6(3) 6-4

2004 Costa Do Sauipe
Clay QF Jose Acasuso bt Tomas Behrend
0-6 6-2 6-4

2004 Estoril
Clay R32 Richard Gasquet bt Nicolas Massu
0-6 7-6(2) 7-6(5)

2004 Madrid Masters
Hard R64 Mardy Fish bt Mario Ancic
0-6 6-4 6-4

2004 Houston
Clay R32 Franco Squillari bt Taylor Dent
0-6 7-5 7-6(5)

2004 Houston
Clay R16 Luis Horna bt Stephane Robert
0-6 6-1 6-3

2004 Hamburg Masters
Clay R32 Fernando Gonzalez bt Julian Knowle
0-6 6-4 6-2

2004 Miami Masters
Hard R128 Karol Kucera bt Alex Bogomolov Jr
0-6 7-6(3) 6-4

2005 Buenos Aires
Clay QF Gaston Gaudio bt Rafael Nadal
0-6 6-0 6-1

2005 Indianapolis
Hard R32 Paul Goldstein bt Max Mirnyi
0-6 6-3 6-3

2005 Washington
Hard R64 Wayne Arthurs bt Phillip Simmonds
0-6 6-3 6-1

2005 Washington
Hard R32 Tomas Zib bt Jonas Bjorkman
0-6 6-3 7-5

2005 Cincinnati Masters
Hard R64 Juan Carlos Ferrero bt Stefan Koubek
0-6 6-3 6-2

2005 Gstaad
Clay QF Razvan Sabau bt Potito Starace
0-6 7-5 7-5

2005 Palermo
Clay F Igor Andreev bt Filippo Volandri
0-6 6-1 6-3

2005 Davis Cup G2 R1: COL vs BRA Clay RR Bruno Soares bt Sergio Ramirez
0-6 6-3 6-3

2006 Beijing
Hard R32 Danai Udomchoke bt Marco Chiudinelli
0-6 6-2 6-3

2006 Acapulco
Clay R32 Razvan Sabau bt Potito Starace
0-6 7-5 6-3

2006 Kitzbuhel
Clay R32 Mikhail Youzhny bt Martin Vassallo Arguello
0-6 6-4 7-6(2)

2006 Rome Masters
Clay R32 Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo bt Marat Safin
0-6 7-6(6) 7-6(3)

2006 Miami Masters
Hard R32 Simon Greul bt Tim Henman
0-6 6-1 7-5

2006 Vina del Mar
Clay R32 Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo bt Nicolas Almagro
0-6 6-3 6-1

2007 Metz
Hard F Tommy Robredo bt Andy Murray
0-6 6-2 6-3

2007 Monte Carlo Masters Clay R32 Kristof Vliegen bt Marat Safin
0-6 7-6(8) 6-4

2007 Sopot
Clay R32 Stefan Koubek bt Agustin Calleri
0-6 7-6(3) 7-5

2007 Sydney
Hard R16 Evgeny Korolev bt Robby Ginepri
0-6 6-4 6-4

2008 Washington
Hard QF Viktor Troicki bt Andy Roddick
0-6 6-2 6-4

2008 Hamburg Masters
Clay R64 Jo Wilfried Tsonga bt Nicolas Mahut
0-6 7-6(5) 6-2

2008 Stuttgart
Clay R32 Eduardo Schwank bt Guillermo Coria
0-6 6-1 6-2

2008 Davis Cup G2 R2: BAH vs PAR Hard RR Juan Carlos Ramirez bt Marvin Rolle
0-6 6-4 6-2

2009 Moscow
Hard QF Illya Marchenko bt Evgeny Korolev
0-6 6-2 6-3

2009 Stuttgart
Clay R32 Michael Berrer bt Stefan Koubek
0-6 7-6(3) 7-6(4)

2009 Miami Masters
Hard R128 Bobby Reynolds bt Juan Ignacio Chela
0-6 7-5 6-4

2009 Metz
Hard R32 Christophe Rochus bt Fabrice Santoro
0-6 6-4 7-6(3)

2009 Houston
Clay R32 Scoville Jenkins bt Alexander Peya
0-6 6-4 6-3

2009 Costa Do Sauipe
Clay R32 Fabio Fognini bt Caio Zampieri
0-6 7-6(5) 6-2

2009 Vina del Mar
Clay QF Tommy Robredo bt Juan Ignacio Chela
0-6 6-3 6-4

2009 Hamburg
Clay R32 Simon Greul bt Mischa Zverev
0-6 7-5 6-1

2009 Brisbane
Hard R16 Jo Wilfried Tsonga bt Jarkko Nieminen
0-6 7-6(1) 7-6(5)

2010 Costa Do Sauipe
Clay R16 Fabio Fognini bt Marcel Granollers
0-6 6-1 7-6(1)

2010 Memphis
Hard R32 Michael Russell bt Wayne Odesnik
0-6 7-5 6-4

2010 Doha
Hard F Nikolay Davydenko bt Rafael Nadal
0-6 7-6(8) 6-4

2011 Casablanca
Clay R16 Pere Riba bt Andrey Golubev
0-6 6-1 7-5

2011 Shanghai Masters
Hard R64 Kei Nishikori bt Robin Haase
0-6 7-5 7-6(5)

2011 Queen’s Club
Grass R32 Radek Stepanek bt Ivan Ljubicic
0-6 7-5 6-4

2012 Canada Masters
Hard R64 Matthew Ebden bt Peter Polansky
0-6 6-4 6-3

2012 Santiago
Clay R32 Rogerio Dutra Silva bt Maximo Gonzalez
0-6 7-6(3) 6-3

2012 Belgrade
Clay QF Benoit Paire bt Jarkko Nieminen

Why does a player who wins 6-1 in the first set, loses in the second set in tennis matches?

Such a good question and so many answers available. All of them opinion rather than answers of fact.

The person who lost could be the better player and just couldn’t find their range and were missing their go to shots.

The person who lost could have had a real mental lapse and at about 4–1 felt their game was coming back and decided to go for it in the next two sets.

The person who won had the best set of their life and could not continue that level of play for another set.

The person who won started to get really tired and doubtful about whether or not they could keep it up.

The person who won did so by repetition and the person who lost figured out the pattern.

It could be any number of reasons why this happens. Sometimes the person who lost the first set goes on to win the next two and the match. The ultimate winner is usually the better player and just took a while to get in their groove.

Tennis: What is it called when you win a game from 40-0?

In Tennis, its called to “hold to love” or a “love game” when someone wins the point (and so the game) right after holding 40-0. That’s 4 straight winning points for the player, completely shutting out the opponent in that game.

Also its called Golden Set if someone wins the Set by winning all points in the set, that is 24 straight winning points (6-0) in that set. Yaroslava Shvedova won the Golden Set at Wimbledon 2012 against Sara Errani. Shvedova won all 24 points played in that first set. What is tennis slang for winning 6-0?

Has any tennis player ever come back from being down 0-6, 0-6 to win a best of 5 set match?

If you mean losing the first twelve games then no, I have no record of that. However there are six known occasions in a best of five match when the winning player lost two sets 0–6. They are:

1935 US Pro Tennis Championship — Bill Tilden d. Karel Koželuh, 0–6 6–1 6–4 0–6 6–4

1938 US National Championhsips — Gilbert Hunt d. Bobby Riggs 6–2 0–6 9–7 0–6 6–4

1962 Tasmanian Championship — Rod Laver d. Neale Fraser, 7–5 0–6 0–6 6–1 6–2

1969 French Open — Stanley Matthews d. Ilie Nastase, 6–3 0–6 0–6 6–4 8–6

1969 French Open — Dennis Ralston d. Patricio Rodriguez, 6–2 6–4 0–6 0–6 6–4

1981 US Open — Jose Luis Clerc d. Mel Purcell, 6–3 0–6 0–6 6–4 6–3

Strangely for such a rare phenomenon, it happened twice in successive days at the 1969 French Open. Matthews beat Nastase in R1, and Ralson beat Rodriguez in R2. What is tennis slang for winning 6-0?

Conclusion

Why does a player who wins 6-0 in the first set lose in the second set in tennis matches? When you have evenly match players, the result often comes down to confidence, so if one player starts of really well, they get on a roll and the other struggles and near the end of the first set, may stop trying as they feel the first set is lost.

But as soon as the second set starts, its like a new beginning for that player and they come our with their best effort, now it only takes a few misses for the winner of the first set to loose confidence and the looser of the first set to start feeling confident, this is what make the best of 5 set matches so interesting, as you see many confidence swings in the longer matches, generally the stronger mind wins, if the playing standards are similar.

There is a big zero on the score board when it is called ‘love’ in the game of tennis.

‘Love all’-Both the players are at zero score. In the beginning, that big zero was being addressed in french terminology for egg as L’oeuf(as zero resembles the shape of an egg)

With pronunciation and use, ‘L’oeuf’ has become ‘Love’. 15,30,45 and 60 doesn’t show any logic and appears to be random. But it is also said that 40 can be pronounced or yelled to be easily understood than yelling a 45. Hence the score sequence came into existence.

What is tennis slang for winning 6-0?